” I want to live the great adventure of being myself “. Simone de Beauvoir decided it very young: she will not let herself be locked up by codes dictated by men. The documentary broadcast on LCP draws an intimate portrait of the author of the book ” The Second Sex “. The chronological account, full of anecdotes, links the personal life of Simone de Beauvoir to her intellectual journey.
Archival footage is mixed with interviews with contemporary feminists. Simone de Beauvoir ” opens the door of the prison in which women have been locked for millennia ”, Sums up the philosopher Élisabeth Badinter in her own way. Simone de Beauvoir herself had to bend the bars of the Parisian bourgeoisie into which she was born.
→ READ. A “Great Crossing” to rediscover Simone de Beauvoir
Nicknamed ” the Beaver »By her fellow students for her unifying and constructive temperament, Simone de Beauvoir has led her life with a single watchword, her freedom.
Non-conformism and criticism
The couple she formed with Jean-Paul Sartre allows for contingent relationships. Simone will refuse marriage all her life. “ She revolutionized the definition of love which is no longer described as a monogamous fusion in which the wife waits for her husband at home », Comments the writer Leïla Slimani. The philosopher François Noudelmann underlines that “ female friendships and loves have had a very important dimension in her life, and yet have received very little comment. “. In a France which has not yet experienced May 68, the writer’s anti-conformism shocks a large part of society. Subjected to many criticisms, she was even nicknamed “Notre Dame de Sartre”, accused of living in the shadow of her companion. But the couple is intellectually united.
→ LARGE FORMAT. Equality, veil, gender … Feminism, the shift of generations
They will engage politically during the Cold War in favor of communism. Simone will recognize “ his naivety Several years later without renouncing the revolutionary ideal. His fight for gender equality still resonates: “ Never forget that it will only take a political, economic or religious crisis for the rights of women to be called into question. She wrote in 1949.